Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

DLAD PGI



PGI 17.9503(e):

An example of a contract management plan is atttached from DSCP’s Subsistence Conus PV program: (example: contract mgt plan.pdf) (see https://today.dla.mil/j-3/j-336/logisticspolicy/procpolicy/default.htm )

PGI 17.9504 Pricing

(a) A PV Contract must be able to comply fully with one of the following established PV Pricing Models:

Pricing Model

Initial Price Reasonableness Determination

Post-Award Price Reasonableness Determination

Audits

Fixed Price utilizing Distribution and Pricing Agreement (DAPA) and Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) pricing*

*e.g. Medical/Surgical and Pharmaceutical

Competitively awarded using best value.

All prices are determined fair and reasonable by Contracting Officer before time of award.

The Contracting Officer makes 100% fair and reasonable determinations for new items and price changes.

Pricing: Monthly, Quarterly, Annually

Execution Compliance: Quarterly

Internal Review: Annually

Fixed Price Utilizing Market Basket*

* e.g. Garrison Feeding

Competitively awarded using best value.

Market basket items must represent at least 75% of the anticipated dollar value of the planned acquisition.

The prices of all market basket items are determined fair and reasonable by Contracting Officer before time of award. NAPA and Central Contract pricing may apply.

The Contracting Officer makes 100% fair and reasonable determinations for new items and price changes.

Pricing: Monthly, Quarterly, Annually

Execution Compliance: Quarterly

Internal Review: Annually

Pricing Model

Initial Price Reasonableness Determination

Post-Award Price Reasonableness Determination

Audits

       

Fixed Price Utilizing Market Basket*

* e.g. Food Service Equipment, MRO Supplies, Fire Fighting and Safety Equipment, Material Handling Equipment, Lumber, Metals

Competitively awarded using best value.

Market basket items must represent at least 75% of the anticipated dollar value of the planned acquisition.

The prices of all market basket items are determined fair and reasonable by Contracting Officer before time of award.

If the contractor complies with the Tailored Logistics Support Purchasing Review clause, the Contracting Officer makes fair and reasonable determinations as follows for new items and price changes:

- For line items with an extended value of less than $2,500, a representative statistical sampling of lines sufficient to provide a 90% confidence level shall be reviewed on post-award basis no later than 60 days after award.

- For line items with an extended value of $2,500 to $24,999, 100% of the items with a percentage of determinations performed pre-order and the remainder post-order. The minimum percentage for pre-order is 30%, with the remainder done no later than 60 days after award.

- For line items with an extended value greater than $25,000, 100% of the items shall be determined fair and reasonable prior to any order being processed.

If the contractor does not comply with the Tailored Logistics Support Purchasing Review clause, the Contracting Officer makes 100% fair and reasonable determinations for new items and price changes.

The Contracting Officer reviews 100% of incidental services and negotiates proper scope, pricing, and rates of labor categories prior to commencement of services.

Pricing: Monthly, Quarterly, Annually

Execution Compliance: Quarterly

Internal Review: Annually

Fixed Price Utilizing Market Basket and competition of each order*

* e.g. Special Ops, MRO Centcom

Competitively awarded using best value.

Market basket items must represent at least 75% of the anticipated dollar value of the planned acquisition.

The prices of all market basket items are determined fair and reasonable by Contracting Officer before time of award.

The Contracting Officer competes each order among prime vendors.

The Contracting Officer makes 100% fair and reasonable determinations for new items and price changes.

The Contracting Officer reviews 100% of incidental services and negotiates proper scope, pricing, and rates of labor categories prior to commencement of services.

Pricing: Monthly, Quarterly, Annually

Execution Compliance: Quarterly

Internal Review: Annually

Tailored Logistics Support Service Contract with competition of each order*

* e.g. MRO Services

Competitively awarded using best value.

Vendors evaluated on price using sample tasks.

The Contracting Officer competes each order among vendors.

Pricing: Monthly, Quarterly, Annually

Execution Compliance: Quarterly

Internal Review: Annually

PGI 17.9505 (a)

Pre-award tools include, but are not limited to those found at https://today.dla.mil/j-3/j-336/logisticspolicy/procpolicy/default.htm

PGI 17.9507(c)(ii).

Price Review tools include but are not limited to those found at https://today.dla.mil/j-3/j-336/logisticspolicy/procpolicy/default.htm

PGI 17.9507 (c)(v)

Management tools for oversight include, but are not limited to those found at https://today.dla.mil/j-3/j-336/logisticspolicy/procpolicy/default.htm

Previous PageTop Of PageTable Of ContentsNext Page