<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE dita
  PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DITA Composite//EN" "ditabase.dtd">
<dita xmlns:ditaarch="http://dita.oasis-open.org/architecture/2005/"
      domains="(topic task)                            (topic concept)                            (topic concept glossentry)                            (topic concept glossgroup)                            (topic reference)                            (topic troubleshooting++task) (topic task)                            (topic abbrev-d)                            a(props deliveryTarget)                            (topic equation-d)                            (topic hazard-d)                            (topic hi-d)                            (topic indexing-d)                            (topic markup-d)                            (topic mathml-d)                            (topic pr-d)                            (topic relmgmt-d)                            (topic sw-d)                            (topic svg-d)                            (topic ui-d)                            (topic ut-d)                            (topic markup-d xml-d)                            (topic task strictTaskbody-c)   "
      ditaarch:DITAArchVersion="1.3">
   <concept id="DFARS_215.404-71-5"
            ditaarch:DITAArchVersion="1.3"
            class="- topic/topic concept/concept ">
      <title class="- topic/title ">
         <ph props="autonumber" class="- topic/ph ">215.404-71-5</ph> Cost efficiency factor.</title>
      <conbody class="- topic/body  concept/conbody ">
         <p outputclass="List1" class="- topic/p ">(a)  This special factor provides an incentive for contractors to reduce costs.  To the extent that the contractor can demonstrate cost reduction efforts that benefit the pending contract, the contracting officer may increase the prenegotiation profit objective by an amount not to exceed 4 percent of total objective cost (Block 20 of the DD Form 1547) to recognize these efforts (Block 29).</p>
         <p outputclass="List1" class="- topic/p ">(b)  To determine if using this factor is appropriate, the contracting officer shall consider criteria, such as the following, to evaluate the benefit the contractor’s cost reduction efforts will have on the pending contract:</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(1)  The contractor’s participation in Single Process Initiative improvements;</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(2)  Actual cost reductions achieved on prior contracts;</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(3)  Reduction or elimination of excess or idle facilities;</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(4)  The contractor’s cost reduction initiatives (e.g., competition advocacy programs, technical insertion programs, obsolete parts control programs, spare parts pricing reform, value engineering, outsourcing of functions such as information technology).  Metrics developed by the contractor such as fully loaded labor hours (i.e., cost per labor hour, including all direct and indirect costs) or other productivity measures may provide the basis for assessing the effectiveness of the contractor’s cost reduction initiatives over time;</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(5)  The contractor’s adoption of process improvements to reduce costs;</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(6)  Subcontractor cost reduction efforts;</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(7) The contractor’s effective incorporation of commercial products or commercial services and commercial processes; or</p>
         <p outputclass="List2" class="- topic/p ">(8)  The contractor’s investment in new facilities when such investments contribute to better asset utilization or improved productivity.</p>
         <p outputclass="List1" class="- topic/p ">(c)  When selecting the percentage to use for this special factor, the contracting officer has maximum flexibility in determining the best way to evaluate the benefit the contractor’s cost reduction efforts will have on the pending contract.  However, the contracting officer shall consider the impact that quantity differences, learning, changes in scope, and economic factors such as inflation and deflation will have on cost reduction.</p>
      </conbody>
   </concept>
</dita>
